The Kamala Conundrum: America's Great Pretender has Turned Failing Upward into a Path to the Presidency. Only Women can Fix This.

Women are deciding whether they want fake progress now with a proudly incompetent, economically illiterate, Neo-Socialist or real progress in 2028 with an economically savvy female commander-in-chief.

Stop calling Kamala Harris “stupid.” With her maniacal laugh, cocksure, infantile, and demonstrably false explanations of things she doesn’t grasp (e.g., cloud computing), it's easy to reach that conclusion. But "stupid" doesn’t capture Kamala’s smiling infectious gall that’s disproportionate to what she knows and has accomplished. As I noted weeks ago, simplistic ad hominems only feed Harris’s superpower: like her riot-enabling, drunk-driving, stolen valor running mate, Tim Walz, she grows in strength from being underestimated.

You could meanly argue that her absurd level of entitlement is born of patronizing human resource lies that signal to “DEI-hires” how “special” they are. Before the Supreme Court ruled against the practice, consider all the affirmation action athletes let into Harvard, Yale, and Stanford who didn't academically belong but made legacy donors feel good about themselves. When they graduated, many quickly hit their Peter Principle level of incompetence.

Credit Harris for taking the culturally, politically, and academically realistic route: historically black Howard University undergrad, then third-tier Hastings College of Law. After failing the bar exam on her first try––81% of her cohort passed it––Harris would have been suitable for a public defender spot or enforcing equity mandates at a federal agency. No sober observer at the time would have said Harris had “the right stuff” to be California's most potent legal authority, let alone Senator and Vice President. The citizens of Iowa didn’t think so either in 2020, forcing Harris to drop out before the caucuses commenced.

Yet, here we are: this joyful striver now leads her Republican opponent in the Real Clear Politics (RCP) popular vote and is razor close in the RCP Electoral College tally. Gobsmacked Americans ask: how did this happen? What exceptional talent does Harris possess to rise from failing a bar exam to crashing in her first presidential run to embarrasing herself as our nation’s de facto “border czar" to being mysteriously coronated as the Democratic nominee for President? What, one ponders, has she accomplished outside of bailing out BLM rioters and enabling California’s smash-and-grab epidemic?

Republicans say she’s a con artist. But the Left says Trump is one, too, though that’s a fudge. Trump may be a showman, salesman, flack, and bloviator, but he delivers on his promises. Only Trump-deranged Democrats fail to see that. Every time that I calmly, respectfully, and graciously show empirical evidence of Trump’s bipartisan wins, they spin out, tweaker-style, into a bipolar fusillade of MSDNC talking points followed by the inevitable descent into foam-at-the-mouth ad hominem, otherwise seen on Marin mental wards and LA street corners. After witnessing hundreds of examples of this dysregulated behavior, I’ve concluded that in each case, there must have been some profound early childhood trauma connected to the Spartacus Youth League, a successful father, or paint thinner.

But saying Kamala Harris is a con artist is not quite the point either. She is The Great Pretender. But so was Reagan and Obama, too.

So, what is it with Kamala? Is it ambition, Brutus? Any woman who’d slither up the political flagpole with a Willie 31-years her senior certainly has ambition. Megyn Kelly, the subject of the movie Bombshell––who knows a thing or two about imbalance of power in relationships––replied to Naomi Wolf’s claim of “sexism” in such critiques. Kamala “actually did sleep her way into and upwards in California politics,” said Kelly, “and most women (and men) may learn that and see it for what it is: evidence of an unqualified political aspirant getting ahead based on smthg other than merit.” After all, Willie Brown gave the 30-year-old Harris a BMW, trips to Paris and the Oscars, and promoted her to the lucrative low-work California Medical Assistance Commission. It’s hard to claim it’s sexist when Brown himself publicly copped to the grift: “Yes, we dated. Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker. And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco.”

But is it just naked hankering and pankering with Kamala? Many go-getter mistresses and call girls get nowhere in life, let alone a heartbeat away from the Presidency. What Kamala Harris has––what kneejerk feminists, racialists, and Democratic Party apparatchiks cop to in private––is guile. Call it hooker’s chutzpah or showgirl’s verve, but Kamala Devi Harris will do whatever it takes to get where she wants. She will lie. She will cheat. She will stick a figurative shiv into the current President while publicly defending him to the hilt. She will shapeshift in whatever direction a client wants. She will allow herself to be managed, massaged, and manipulated. She aims to please because she has her “eyes on the prize.” Not civil rights, Alice Wine, but ultimate power.

Trump is competitive, courageous, and instinctually concerned about the survival of our republic—J6 notwithstanding—but he lacks guile. He talks a good game but often refuses to do what is necessary. He is stubborn, showboating, and hard to wrangle. At times, it feels like he’s not in it to win it, but––as I made clear in a piece that should have made the rounds in Trumpworld but likely didn’t––for ulterior motives. Trump is too upfront. Kamala hides her scorpion nature behind a laugh, an endearing smile, sexual innuendo, killer dance moves, and mountains of pablum.

Kamala Harris' supporters don't give a good gosh about her policy positions except one: she will protect a woman’s right to abortion right up to and after the child is born. That is holy orthodoxy to her, them, it/they. As for the rest of her Neo-Socialist positions, her supporters don't care about what's practically best for the country. That America might elect two enablers of the Summer of Insurrection to the offices of President and Vice President is immaterial to these CNN mainliners.

Kamala will say anything to distract from the fact that it was hers and Biden’s grotesque overspending that led to the untenable inflation of the past four years. First, Biden/Harris blamed Putin. Then, they blamed COVID supply chain bottlenecks long after those were resolved. Kamala now blames the largely made-up problem of "price gouging" by grocers, who are in the worst business imaginable, with a 1-2% net profit.

Harris's solution to these fake causalities is to spend more of your money: child credits, first-time homebuyer credits, student loan forgiveness, forgiveness of ALL MEDICAL DEBT, plus free health care and college for illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, Harris's price controls will increase food shortages, causing more inflation.

Kamala plans this orgy of pricey new policy just as the existing Biden/Harris inflation is finally coming under control due to draconian interventions from the Federal Reserve, not from any fiscal prudence from Democrats.

Women of America, I have always praised your strength, wisdom, and clarity. This election is in your hands. Anything I say is more “mansplaining,” though I have a few questions.

Do you despise Trump so much that you are willing to be eviscerated economically, even though Trump is moderate on abortion? If so, why not vote Libertarian or write in a sensible woman with a grasp of basic economics? Names like Nikki Haley, Meg Whitman, or even the Trump-obsessed Liz Cheney?

All you women CEOs and small business owners must know that Kamala and her big-spending, open-borders, soft-on-crime party will be disastrous for your company, right? Do you honestly think you will be magically shielded from the dire economic effects of her redistributionist agenda? Why punish the country because you detest one man?

I realize my questions will go nowhere. Big Tech will ensure that. It’s like asking you not to allow biological men in female sports.

So, everyone, ponder this. Trump and MAGA have this election all wrong. It seems to be about race, but it’s about gender. It’s about girl power and clapping back at men. It’s about a big Fowler Underwood from black women, which is why many black men are running towards Trump. It’s an intense FU from Jewish women who hate Trump with a breathtaking fury that is deeply unnerving when you encounter it. Democratic Jewish women hate Trump more than they love themselves or even Israel. Due to the grotesque Trump-is-Hitler lie, Jewish women are the most unhinged of Trump haters, even though Trump is the most pro-Israel President in U.S. history—he engineered the Abraham Accords, took out ISIS, moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem—while the pro-Hamas Democratic Left is patently anti-Semitic.

However, the F U mainly comes from single women of all ethnicities who became unglued and reunited when an old interview arose of J.D. Vance crudely calling them out. Members of this cohort can't publicly admit that the streets of San Francisco are unsafe due to Harris’s disastrous policies as Attorney General. The “Yes, We Cat” lady thinks: “I’ll step over that feces-covered monster who lives next to my dumpster, but Trump said he likes to 'grab em' by the pussy!' I wish someone would grab me by the…” (trails off).

Single women are blithely confident they will never be raped and murdered by illegal immigrants or robbed in San Francisco’s Union Square. “I don't care what she stands for,” they reason. “She's NOT TRUMP!"

Harris feeds off that rage and false hope. Her cockamamie economic ideas will send this country straight into a recession, but so what? “At least Trump will not be president!” shout the babes of Bumble, who often cannot name one policy win in Harris’s decades of public service.

Harris will capture these and most other women unless working-class and middle-class married moms stand up and say, "Whoa, whoa, wait a minute, there, purple-haired riot girl. We, too, want a female President, but not this grifty incompetent floozy."

As bright as Kamala’s shine is, most American women of America don’t cotton much to coronations. Harris has never won a single primary vote. She’s never been vetted in a competitive process with multiple other presidential candidates. She’s never sat down for even one interview, let alone stood for a press conference since being selected as the Democratic standard-bearer in a backroom coup reeking of New York’s Tammany Hall. Now, she feels she has the luxury of turning down a debate on Fox.

Many women don’t like Donald Trump—his narcissism, crazy conspiracies, womanizing, and insult comic approach. Still, they know he’s been tested: as a businessman, candidate, President, from endless Democratic lawfare, and a would-be assassin’s bullet. Trump courageously and transparently talks to the press, on hostile networks, at rude and antagonistic gatherings. Kamala won’t. She has not been tested. She avoids any situation in which she might be exposed. Common-sense women will hopefully see that and think, “Yes, but not this way.”

At some point, Kamala the Untouchable’s free ride through life and politics must face a reckoning. As writer River Page wrote about an entertaining TV appearance by Harris, “Kamala actually has charisma, but it’s the charisma of like a fun aunt who takes pills, not a politician, which is unfortunate. She could be THRIVING as the host of some Kathie and Hoda style morning show.”

Men can do nothing about this Kamala catastrophe except shut up and pray.