Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Spouting Thomas's avatar

Good writing, and I think your point is directionally valid, but you sound too definitive here. It's true that the Dems are better at this stuff. But wasn't that also true in 2016? I think they've always been better at it.

The Republican base has gotten somewhat dumber since then, I suppose, as educated suburban voters have shifted D. But I would expect the electoral machinery to lag the base in this regard.

Maybe, as you point out, early voting has changed the game and given the Dems a tool to durably expand their edge. But do you know for a fact that it's public information that someone has already early voted and that parties can use that information? Does this perhaps vary by state? I'm really not sure, though if the rules do vary by state, that would be very relevant knowledge to have.

I also think if the Dems lose minority support, that makes all their efforts harder. I think one reason their get-out-the-vote efforts are so effective is that historically, every black person they can get to submit a ballot translates almost 1:1 to a vote for them. It also helps that their target demographic often lives in concentrated areas, in urban neighborhoods. I have to think it's harder, just logistically, to round up the votes of aging rural whites. So if Dems' black support starts to slip, or if blacks just become a little less responsive to D get-out-the-vote efforts and more inclined to stay home, then that's an automatic penalty to D efforts, even if the Rs can't actually convince any of them to vote their way.

In short, I think Nate Silver is correct that Trump would probably win if the race were held today but that Biden will close that gap over the next several months and make this race much tighter, if not lean D, and the organizational advantage you describe is one reason for it. But by all appearances, to extend your b-ball metaphor, this one will still come down to the buzzer.

Expand full comment
The Crotty Farm Report's avatar

Great response. I do sound a bit definitive. And Trump could pull it out, but it won't be because he played like the Denver Nuggets. It will be because the Democrats failed to do what they do so well: close hard. I would be more bullish on Trump if he was up by 10% in key swing states. That might be too prohibitive a cushion for even the Democratic Machine to overcome. But he is not. He has built-in negatives that cannot be overcome. His VP pick could ameliorate some but not most of it.

In truth, the Republicans during the Karl Rove years had a tremendous ground game. They were strategic. They knew where to find new and reluctant voters. And they knew what specific local ballot initiatives would drive select voters in select states to the polls. I disliked Rove, Cheney, and the Bushes. I will never forgive them for the deceitfully sold Iraq War. Their use of homophobic ballot initiatives was quite cynical and wrong. But they played the game well, with intelligence and finesse. In his war on "Low Energy Jeb" and the NeoCon GOP establishment, Trump lost all that know-how. If he brought the NeoCons back in, they would try to sabotage him anyway, as they did during his first term. Their allegiance is not to party or country, but to the military-industrial complex and forever wars, which Trump opposed. So Trump has to wing it.

The Dems have not even used their real powder yet. They've softened up the target through lawfare, media disinformation, and Big Tech dominance. They kept the game close. Now they will close with an avalanche of negative advertising, phone calls, text assaults, and door-to-door canvassers. Campaigns have access to voter databases: their registered party, and their donations to public officials. That's enough to put together the lists the Dems need. Plus who knows what the Dems are up to with AI. They are always a step ahead and they play together when it counts.

Trump's better polling with Hispanics could spell the difference in Arizona and Nevada. But winning over sufficient urban blacks in PA and MI is going to be tough. He will win some, but that gain will be offset by his losses among suburban women on the abortion question, even though Trump is sane and moderate on the issue.

I have seen the script before. Trump is up in polls, with tremendous enthusiasm among his base, only to disappoint when it counted. And that's due to all the problems I articulated, which by his public rhetoric he seems uninterested in changing. The key to winning in any sport is the ability to make adjustments on the fly. The GOP in this era is always one step behind.

Expand full comment

No posts